Skip to main content

Guest column: Is climate change a national security risk?

(Andy Tullis/Bulletin photo) 6812427 The Central Oregon Military Officers Association of America at its recent dinner meeting heard from Gordon Molitor, a member of the Citizens Climate Lobby, who spoke about climate change as a national security risk. In his presentation, Mr. Molitor, who is neither a scientist nor a military veteran, cited several Department of Defense studies that purport to warn of impending disasters and security challenges due to climate change. Mr. Molitor, a longtime community and environmental activist from Portland, dutifully recited the usual climate alarmist talking points: more frequent and more extreme weather events, glacial melt, cities and coastal areas at risk from climate change and sea level rise, melting ice in the Arctic creating a new ocean, drought, carbon dioxide increasing at the fastest rate in history and the canard parroted by all climate alarmists— 97 percent consensus of scientists about catastrophic climate change. The latter claim is invariably used as a way to shut off debate by portraying skeptics as deniers. In one particularly dramatic graphic, Mr. Molitor depicted the effects of rising sea levels on the Hampton Roads, Virginia, area. Home to a large naval station and other military installations, Hampton Roads is a low-lying coastal area bordering the Atlantic Ocean, the Chesapeake Bay and several rivers. Mr. Molitor illustrated how much of Hampton Roads would be inundated by a 3-meter rise in sea level. A 3-meter rise would indeed be catastrophic, causing massive flooding and dislocation of military facilities and local inhabitants. However, even the UN International Panel on Climate Change, which has routinely overstated temperature increases and sea level rise using flawed models, does not predict a sea-level rise of the magnitude shown by Mr. Molitor. At the end of his talk, Mr. Molitor asked COMOAA to urge its national organization to declare climate change as a national security threat. He also encouraged participation in CCL, a group that is pushing for legislation to place a “fee” on fossil fuels (otherwise known as a carbon tax) in order to cut greenhouse gas emissions. When I questioned both Mr. Molitor and his associate, Ms. Siedler, of the CCL’s Bend chapter about the scientific basis for their claims after the presentation, both said that they are confident of the science and noted their reliance on IPCC data. I told them that I prefer to rely on evidence presented by reputable climate scientists like Dr. Gordon Fulks. The science of climate change does not support the alarmist claims such as those cited by Mr. Molitor. As mentioned in previous columns, the climate is no more catastrophic now than in the past, carbon dioxide has been substantially higher in the past, previous warming periods were warmer than the current one and human emission of carbon dioxide is only 4 percent of the total. Though no doubt well-meaning, both Mr. Molitor and Ms. Siedler are wrong in their assumptions about climate change. They are part of an effort by the climate alarmist cabal to force local, state and federal governments to spend billions chasing the chimera of climate change and to generate more revenue for their pet projects by imposing a carbon tax. This tax will accomplish little in the way of reducing carbon emissions but will result in economic hardship and redistribution of funds from businesses to climate activists. Fortunately, the members of COMOAA had the benefit of a presentation on climate change by Dr. Fulks, an eminent astrophysicist and climate scientist, a few months ago. Few, if any, were persuaded by Mr. Molitor’s unscientific arguments. Regrettably, the climate alarmist crowd has the big megaphone with the mainstream media, which supports its efforts. Until recently, the government did too. Under President Donald Trump, a more realistic assessment of the national security threat posed by climate change is being implemented, and voices like that of Dr. Fulks have gained prominence in the debate. By Paul deWitt

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Study: Majority of U.S. Broadband Households Concerned About Security of IoT Devices

As Internet-connected devices become more ubiquitous, security and privacy concerns of end users are also on the rise. Simply installing security systems in smart homes is no longer enough. Security integrators must also consider bolstering cybersecurity measures when installing their systems. A recently released whitepaper from IoT research firm Parks Associates, titled “Residential Security and Encryption: Setting the Standard, Protecting Consumers,” reveals that 64% of U.S. broadband households are concerned about security and privacy when using their connected devices. Parks Associates also found that the majority of homeowners assume security integrators are addressing their cybersecurity concerns. In fact, a Parks Associates survey of U.S. security owners found 63% of professionally monitored subscribers believe the wireless signals from their system are encrypted, even though encryption is currently not the industry-wide standard. While the whitepaper outlines a few ...

The Benefits of a DIY Home Security System

This week’s mailbag addresses the pros and cons of a DIY home security system, how to browse the internet without being tracked, the best way to secure firearms in your home — and more. Let’s get started. I am investigating home security systems since I am not at home constantly. What are some things I should look for in a good home security system? Do you have any recommendations? — Ken R. First, decide whether you want to install a “do-it-yourself” home security system or have a professional company come to your home and install it for you. Before making this decision, check with your local police department and ask if they respond to residential alarms. In most larger cities, they won’t — but the company providing your home security usually has private guards who will respond. If you live in a small town like I do where the police department does respond to intrusion alarms, you might want to go with an alarm company. If you live in a ...

Home and Consumer IoT Security Solutions

Why Consumer IoT Products Need Security Home IoT products offer many conveniences but there are massive amounts of private consumer data being transferred to and from these services vulnerable to attack if left unsecured. Security across an entire IoT home demands proper device authentication and data encryption to ensure that all connections are trusted and communications are protected. PKI Isn’t Just for Web Security Despite common misconceptions, PKI is a perfect match for the exploding IoT sector, providing trust and control. An ideal security solution for smart homes and appliances, PKI can be incorporated during product design, build, deployment, or ongoing maintenance. Streamline management for all your IoT certificates using our scalable platform. Provision, issue, renew, and revoke certificates in one place without additional hassle or manual error. Secure storage and management for certificate keys Custom certificate profiles Automated high-volume deployment Scanning an...