Skip to main content

Airport security checks 'not keeping pace'

Stopping would-be terrorists from planning attacks at Australian airports justifies giving police tougher powers to demand traveller identification, the head of Home Affairs believes. Home Affairs boss Michael Pezzullo said the threshold for making inquiries about people's identities at airports was not keeping pace with security threats. "It's the case that airports are regrettably a high-profile target for international terrorists," Mr Pezzullo told a Senate estimates hearing in Canberra on Monday. "The ability to thwart a mass casualty attack in that environment has to be paramount when we're thinking about police powers." Australian Federal Police officers can already demand people's identification at airports when they have a reasonable suspicion a serious offence may be committed. However, Mr Pezzullo said these powers were not broad enough. Proposed new laws outlined in the budget would allow AFP officers to check identity without cause at airports and order people to leave. "At the moment the threshold is not in keeping with best practice in terms of how to ... keep the travelling public safe," Mr Pezzullo said. The secretary used the example of a person "casing" an airport to plan an attack to illustrate his point. "Until you've asked the person who they are and what they're doing there, you would not have a clue," he said. Mr Pezzullo acknowledged Australia's terror threat level had remained at "probable" since September 2014, but said it was important to keep pace with global threats. "We've got a responsibility in departments and agencies to stay current on attack planning, the trends that we're seeing, what is happening around the world both in terms of potential strikes on airports as well as aircraft." Mr Pezzullo took umbrage at Greens senator Nick McKim for suggesting police officers would march up to travellers and say "papers please". "'Papers please' has a particular connotation which I am sure you are channelling to people who are interested in your views," the secretary said. He said "Excuse me sir, can I see your ID" would be the more likely phrasing. Senator McKim repeatedly asked what would happen to people at airports without ID, but was not given a concrete answer. Independent senator Derryn Hinch, who supports the proposed airport powers, asked what would be done to prevent racial profiling. Mr Pezzullo said AFP officers were expected to act at all times in an ethical, respectful and positive manner. Former Australian Border Force commissioner Roman Quaedvlieg has questioned the need for the proposed new powers. "I think it's largely an illogical argument to say that you need them in an airport precinct to thwart terrorist attacks but you don't need it anywhere else," he told The Saturday Paper. Mr Quaedvlieg said along with appropriate accountability, any extra powers must be properly explained. © AAP 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Security company in Bellevue vandalized

BELLEVUE, Neb. (KMTV) - An Omaha home security company based out of Bellevue is using its own camera to help track down a thief who stole items from outside their building. Chris Malmberg, the owner of Omaha Security Systems Inc. says an unidentified man stole nearly $300 worth of landscaping Sunday night. "The motion sensors went off and I got a notification on my phone that he was there. We saw him take the plants, we watched him drive away and then immediately contacted police," said Malmberg. "He was real nervous, but he ended up stealing shrubbery, Hosta plants, I mean - never in my life have I ever known somebody to steal landscaping." Malmberg said the plants could be replaced, but what's frustrating is that this is one of several vandalism incidents his business has experienced since OSSI moved into the building near Jefferson and Mission Ave. "We've had vandalism, we've had items stolen, or attempted to be stolen, with the security that we...

Study: Majority of U.S. Broadband Households Concerned About Security of IoT Devices

As Internet-connected devices become more ubiquitous, security and privacy concerns of end users are also on the rise. Simply installing security systems in smart homes is no longer enough. Security integrators must also consider bolstering cybersecurity measures when installing their systems. A recently released whitepaper from IoT research firm Parks Associates, titled “Residential Security and Encryption: Setting the Standard, Protecting Consumers,” reveals that 64% of U.S. broadband households are concerned about security and privacy when using their connected devices. Parks Associates also found that the majority of homeowners assume security integrators are addressing their cybersecurity concerns. In fact, a Parks Associates survey of U.S. security owners found 63% of professionally monitored subscribers believe the wireless signals from their system are encrypted, even though encryption is currently not the industry-wide standard. While the whitepaper outlines a few ...

Ring Alarm review: A great DIY home security system with the potential to become even better

Ring builds some of our favorite video doorbells and security camera/outdoor lighting mashups. Now the company—recently acquired by Amazon—is moving inside the home with a strong and inexpensive DIY home security system: Ring Alarm. It’s a fantastic product today, and Ring says it will only get better with time. Ring Alarm is positioned as a mainstream home security system, and while you won’t find a great deal of innovation here (there’s nothing like the Nest Detect sensor that comes with the much-more-expensive Nest Secure system , for example), it’s already equipped with everything it needs to grow into a comprehensive smart home system. Ring Alarm doesn’t support smart lighting controls, door locks, thermostats, garage-door openers, or other common smart home products today, and there’s a very short list of supported third-party products. But it lacks nothing needed to support those and similar devices down the road. And in an intervi...